Blog
/
Investments
/
The "Lost Decade": Why the S&P 500 is Riskier Than You Think

The "Lost Decade": Why the S&P 500 is Riskier Than You Think

By
Jake Skelhorn
March 27, 2025

The S&P 500 is one of the most popular stock indices in the world, representing 500 of the largest U.S.-based companies. Historically, it has delivered an average annual return of around 10% since 1926, making it a go-to investment choice for many. However, as reliable as it may seem, the S&P 500 is not as diversified as some investors believe. Relying solely on it, especially in retirement, can expose your portfolio to significant risks.

One of the best examples of this risk is the "Lost Decade"—a period from 2000 to 2009 where the S&P 500 essentially delivered zero returns. In this article, we’ll analyze this period, compare different investment approaches, and demonstrate why diversification is crucial for retirement planning.

Watch on YouTube:


What Was the Lost Decade?

The "Lost Decade" refers to the ten-year period from 2000 to 2009 when the S&P 500 delivered an annualized return of -0.95%. This performance is rare for such a long stretch in the stock market, as historically, investors expect positive returns over extended periods.

Despite the S&P 500 struggling, other sectors of the market performed relatively well during this time. Investments in small-cap stocks, international stocks, and emerging markets yielded positive returns. This highlights an essential investing lesson—diversification can help reduce risk and improve portfolio performance, particularly during periods of stagnation in the U.S. stock market.

How Different Asset Classes Performed

While the S&P 500 lagged during the Lost Decade, other asset classes thrived. Here are the annualized returns for each:

The S&P500 Index's annualized return from 2000-2009 was negative, while other sectors thrived


  • Large-Cap US Stocks (S&P500): -0.95%
  • Large-Cap Value Stocks: 4.14%
  • Small-Cap Stocks: 7.94%
  • International Value Stocks: 7.07%
  • Emerging Markets: 10.89%

These performance differences highlight why investing beyond the S&P 500 is crucial, particularly for retirees who rely on their portfolio for income.

The Decade After the Lost Decade (2010-2019)

While the S&P 500 underperformed from 2000 to 2009, it rebounded strongly in the following decade, delivering annualized returns of approximately 13.56%. Even though it outperformed many other market segments during this time, a long-term view is necessary. Looking at the entire 20-year period from 2000 to 2019, the S&P 500 still had the lowest overall return compared to more diversified investment approaches.

Backtesting Three Retirement Portfolios

To understand the importance of diversification, let's examine how three different investment portfolios performed from 2000 to 2019. These portfolios assumed a retiree with a $1 million starting balance, withdrawing $40,000 annually (adjusted for inflation), following the 4% rule.

Backtest results of 3 portfolios (listed below) from 2000-2019


Portfolio 1: 100% S&P 500

  • By the end of the Lost Decade (2009), this portfolio had dropped to $455,000.
  • Even by the end of 2019, after the strong recovery, it remained below $400,000.
  • This demonstrates the risk of relying solely on the S&P 500 in retirement.

Portfolio 2: 60% S&P 500, 40% U.S. Bond Market

  • This balanced portfolio performed better, ending the Lost Decade at $733,000.
  • However, it still suffered significant losses and lagged behind a more diversified approach.

Portfolio 3: Diversified Portfolio (Including Small-Cap, International, and Value Stocks)

  • This portfolio maintained exposure to the S&P 500 but also included:
    • U.S. small-cap value stocks
    • Large-cap value stocks
    • International value stocks
    • Global bonds
  • At the end of the Lost Decade, it had grown to $1.2 million, despite annual withdrawals.
  • By the end of 2019, it had grown to $1.9 million, significantly outperforming the other two portfolios.

Key Takeaways for Retirement Planning

  1. Avoid Over-Reliance on the S&P 500

    • While the S&P 500 has a strong historical track record, it has experienced extended periods of underperformance, such as the Lost Decade.
    • A retirement portfolio needs stability and growth, which diversification can help provide.
  2. Diversification Reduces Risk and Improves Stability

    • Spreading investments across asset classes (e.g., small-cap, international, value stocks) helps mitigate risk.
    • A well-diversified portfolio can maintain and even grow wealth during market downturns.
  3. Retirees Must Plan for Market Cycles

    • Retirees need a portfolio that can withstand economic downturns while sustaining withdrawals.
    • Relying solely on one asset class (e.g., U.S. large-cap stocks) could lead to financial insecurity if another Lost Decade occurs.
  4. The 4% Rule Has Limitations

    • While the 4% withdrawal rule is a useful guideline, it doesn’t account for market volatility.
    • A more flexible withdrawal strategy that adapts to market conditions may be necessary.

Final Thoughts

If you’re approaching retirement, it’s essential to ensure your portfolio is properly diversified. Investing beyond the S&P 500 can help reduce risk, improve returns, and provide a more stable financial future. The lessons from the Lost Decade highlight the importance of a well-balanced investment approach.

If you’d like personalized guidance on retirement planning, taxes, and investment strategies, consider consulting a financial advisor. At Spark Wealth Advisors, we specialize in helping retirees build robust portfolios to navigate market ups and downs with confidence.

Looking for more insights? Check out our video on why the traditional 4% withdrawal rule might not be the best approach for modern retirees. Click [here] to watch!

Share: