Blog
/
Financial Planning
/
The Retirement Distribution Hatchet: Why the 4% Rule Fails in Real Life

The Retirement Distribution Hatchet: Why the 4% Rule Fails in Real Life

By
Jake Skelhorn
May 5, 2025


When it comes to retirement planning, the 4% rule has long been a popular guideline. But does it truly reflect how retirees spend money in the real world?

In this article, we’ll introduce a better framework—the Retirement Distribution Hatchet—that addresses the limitations of the 4% rule and incorporates tax strategies, income timing, and real-life spending patterns.

What Is the 4% Rule—and Its Limitations?

The 4% rule, developed by financial advisor William Bengen, suggests that retirees can withdraw 4% of their initial portfolio balance in the first year of retirement and adjust that amount for inflation annually. It was designed to provide a high probability of not running out of money over a 30-year retirement, based on historical data of a 60/40 stock and bond portfolio.

While the rule offers a simple starting point for retirement income planning, it has some critical flaws:

  • It assumes a constant withdrawal rate, regardless of life circumstances.
  • It ignores other income sources, like Social Security and pensions.
  • It doesn’t reflect how people actually spend money throughout retirement.
  • It overlooks tax-efficient withdrawal strategies that could stretch a portfolio further.

These gaps can lead retirees to underspend in their early years or take unnecessary risks later.

Introducing the Retirement Distribution Hatchet

The Retirement Distribution Hatchet offers a more realistic and personalized approach. Instead of assuming flat withdrawals every year, it reflects how income needs—and sources—change over time.

What It Looks Like

Imagine a chart of your retirement withdrawals over time. In early retirement, you may be pulling heavily from your investment portfolio before Social Security or a pension begins. Then, as those guaranteed income sources kick in, your need to tap the portfolio decreases.

That curve—starting high and tapering off—resembles the shape of a hatchet, hence the name.

Why It’s More Accurate

The Retirement Distribution Hatchet takes into account:

  • Delayed Social Security: Many retirees don’t start benefits at age 62. If you wait until age 70, you’ll need to cover 8+ years of income from savings.
  • Pension timing: Some pensions start at different intervals or have survivor benefit reductions.
  • Variable expenses: People often spend more in the early “go-go” years of retirement and less in the “slow-go” and “no-go” phases.

By recognizing that withdrawals aren’t linear, this strategy creates a customized retirement income plan that aligns better with how retirees live and spend.

The Retirement Spending Smile: A Natural Decline in Expenses

Research has shown that inflation-adjusted spending tends to decline over time in retirement. This pattern, known as the retirement spending smile, means retirees often:

  • Spend more in early retirement (travel, hobbies, dining out).
  • See a gradual decline in discretionary expenses.
  • May see a late-life bump due to healthcare or long-term care costs.

The 4% rule doesn't account for this natural curve in spending. The Hatchet model does—by front-loading withdrawals when spending is higher and tapering them as expenses decrease.

This not only better reflects real life but also allows for more flexible tax planning opportunities by shifting when and how withdrawals are taken.

Taxes and the Retirement Distribution Hatchet

A crucial advantage of the Hatchet model is its ability to optimize for taxes. Timing matters, and taking large withdrawals before other income sources begin (like Social Security) can help reduce taxes in several ways:

  • Filling lower tax brackets early can minimize Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) later.
  • Roth conversions in low-income years can reduce future taxable income.
  • Coordinating withdrawals with your Social Security claiming strategy can reduce the taxability of those benefits.

In contrast, blindly following the 4% rule can lead to suboptimal withdrawals from a tax planning perspective, increasing lifetime taxes and reducing net income.

Risk-Based Retirement Income Guardrails

To calculate the personalized withdrawal levels for each retiree’s “hatchet,” a method called risk-based retirement income guardrails can be used.

Here’s how it works:

Monte Carlo Simulation

Rather than relying on a fixed historical scenario, Monte Carlo simulations run 1,000+ potential market return sequences to estimate the probability of success across various withdrawal rates.

The result is an initial withdrawal amount with an 80% confidence level of success (meaning your money is expected to last through life expectancy in 80% of scenarios).

Dynamic Adjustments

Unlike the 4% rule, which remains static, this approach adjusts over time. If market returns are strong, you may be able to increase your spending. If markets perform poorly, the model tightens the spending “guardrails” to preserve your portfolio.

This process:

  • Maximizes your lifetime withdrawals
  • Preserves flexibility
  • Reduces the risk of outliving your money

In short, it’s a retirement income strategy that adapts as life—and the markets—change.

Why This Matters for Your Retirement Planning

For retirees serious about planning, the Retirement Distribution Hatchet and guardrails approach offer:

  • Higher early retirement income, when it matters most
  • More accurate forecasting of real spending behavior
  • Smarter tax efficiency, especially when coordinating with Social Security and Roth strategies
  • Adaptability, which is essential for long retirements with market volatility

Instead of being locked into an outdated rule, you can have a dynamic plan that works with your life—not against it.

Final Thoughts

The 4% rule served its purpose as a basic guide for retirement withdrawals, but today’s retirees need more. The Retirement Distribution Hatchet, paired with a risk-based guardrails approach, provides a smarter, more customized strategy that aligns with actual retirement spending, tax planning opportunities, and evolving income needs.

If you’re planning for retirement—or already in it—consider whether your current withdrawal strategy reflects reality or just a simplified rule. You might discover that a more personalized plan helps you spend more confidently, especially in the years when you’ll enjoy it most.

Want to see what this looks like in a real financial plan?

👉 Check out this video where I walk through a real-world case study of a retirement income guardrails strategy in action.

Share: